Articles
Crypto Market Analysis

Justin Sun sues World Liberty Financial over token lockup

User Image

Por Anônimo

Criado April 22, 2026|2 mins de leitura
Main Image

Sun said the lawsuit is to protect his rights as a WLFI token holder and doesn't change his support of US President Donald Trump and his administration’s efforts to make the US crypto-friendly.

Tron founder Justin Sun said he is suing Trump-family-backed World Liberty Financial for allegedly freezing his tokens and threatening to burn them “without any proper justification.” 

In a post to social media on Wednesday, Sun said the suit, filed in a California federal court, was meant to protect his rights as a token holder.

“I have tried in good faith to resolve this situation with the World Liberty project team without resorting to litigation. But the project team has refused my requests to unfreeze my tokens and restore my rights as a token holder. They have left me with no choice but to turn to the courts,” he added.

Sun is the largest individual investor in World Liberty, a project tied closely to the Trump family.

Sun previously threatened legal action earlier this month over lengthy lockup periods for WLFI’s governance token and accused WLFI’s recent governance proposal of lacking transparency, saying more than 76% of the voting tokens came from 10 wallets.

Related: World Liberty burns 47M tokens in bid to pump price as slide continues

At the time, the WLFI project team said on X that the claims were “baseless allegations” and added, “We have the contracts. We have the evidence. We have the truth. See you in court pal.”

Cointelegraph has contacted the Tron and World Liberty Financial teams for additional comment about the lawsuit. 

Meanwhile, Sun said on X that the lawsuit doesn't change his views on President Donald Trump or his administration. 

“Unfortunately, certain individuals on the World Liberty project team have been operating the project in a manner that goes against President Trump’s values,” Sun said.

Magazine: Will the CLARITY Act be good — or bad — for DeFi 

Source: CoinTelegraph


Outros artigos publicados recentemente

Monument Bank delays retail tokenized deposits, cites regulatory issues in the UK
Monument Bank delays retail tokenized deposits, cites regulatory issues in the UK

Crypto Market Analysis

The London-based challenger bank tapped a Canadian custodian to meet the Financial Conduct Authority...

Polymarket names former Amazon finance chief Warren Jenson as its first CFO
Polymarket names former Amazon finance chief Warren Jenson as its first CFO

Crypto Market Analysis

Jenson becomes the prediction market’s first CFO as Polymarket builds its regulated U.S. exchange ...

Europe’s top regulator questions Polymarket and Kalshi’s EU access, warns of authorization gaps
Europe’s top regulator questions Polymarket and Kalshi’s EU access, warns of authorization gaps

Casino

ESMA said that event contracts may fall under existing EU binary-options bans, crypto-asset framewor...

Why a new SEC plan could ease a legal headache for tokenized securities
Why a new SEC plan could ease a legal headache for tokenized securities

Crypto Market Analysis

The SEC's new proposal to overhaul transfer-agent rules could eliminate duplicate offchain sharehold...

New Clarity Act text tweaks DeFi, credit union provisions, but road ahead for bill remains murky
New Clarity Act text tweaks DeFi, credit union provisions, but road ahead for bill remains murky

DeFi

The Clarity Act needs 60 votes when the Senate returns from its recess next week. Republicans circul...

UK House of Lords backs mandatory digital asset strategy over Labour position
UK House of Lords backs mandatory digital asset strategy over Labour position

Crypto Market Analysis

The amendment would require the UK Treasury to develop a strategy covering cryptoassets, stablecoins...