Articles
Bitcoin

Bank of Korea floats crypto ‘circuit breakers’ after Bithumb blunder

User Image

Por Anônimo

Criado April 13, 2026|2 mins de leitura
Main Image

Bithumb accidentally sent customers 620,000 Bitcoin instead of 620,000 Korean won in February. The Bank of Korea wants lawmakers to make it so it doesn't happen again.

South Korea’s central bank says crypto exchanges should have their own “circuit breakers” that halt trading to prevent a repeat of the market fallout after Bithumb mistakenly sent more than $40 billion in Bitcoin to its customers in February.

The Bank of Korea said in a payments report on Monday that lawmakers should consider introducing mechanisms similar to the Korea Exchange’s trading curbs to suspend trading if crypto prices suddenly fluctuate.

“Currently, the virtual asset industry lacks internal control mechanisms and faces lower regulatory intensity compared to established financial institutions,” the bank said.

“Consequently, as similar incidents could occur at other virtual asset exchanges, it is necessary to strengthen relevant regulations to prevent them in advance,” the report added.

It comes as South Korean lawmakers are currently looking to pass laws to further regulate crypto, which the Bank of Korea said should include its suggested measures “to enhance the safety and transparency of virtual asset exchange operations.”

In early February, Bithumb erroneously sent customers 620,000 Bitcoin (BTC), worth around $42 billion at the time, instead of 620,000 Korean won, worth $400.

The price of Bitcoin on Bithumb fell as users rushed to sell, causing others to panic-sell and further driving down its price, according to the bank’s report.

Bithumb halted trading and reversed its Bitcoin sends within minutes, but the exchange said that 1,788 BTC, worth around $125 million, had been sold before it could act, and it covered the shortfall using company reserves.

Related: South Korea tightens crypto withdrawal-delay exemptions after scam losses

The Bank of Korea suggested that crypto exchanges should be required to have systems capable of detecting and preventing “erroneous payments caused by human error.”

It added that exchanges should also have systems to automatically verify a platform’s internal assets compared to those on the blockchain to flag discrepancies.

Magazine: South Korea gets rich from crypto… North Korea gets weapons

Source: CoinTelegraph


Outros artigos publicados recentemente

AI agent development hasn’t accelerated as expected, Zuckerberg says
AI agent development hasn’t accelerated as expected, Zuckerberg says

Crypto Market Analysis

Mark Zuckerberg’s comments came on the same day that Meta expanded its Meta Business Agent globall...

Teen ‘Scattered Spider’ suspect extradited to US over $8M crypto ransom
Teen ‘Scattered Spider’ suspect extradited to US over $8M crypto ransom

Crypto Market Analysis

Peter Stokes, 19, has been charged in the US for allegedly taking part in a hacking group’s unsucc...

US spot Bitcoin ETFs top $200M in daily inflows for first time since May
US spot Bitcoin ETFs top $200M in daily inflows for first time since May

Bitcoin

US spot Bitcoin ETFs post $221.7 million inflows, the strongest daily intake since early May, as Bit...

Irish authorities seize another 500 Bitcoin, bringing 2026 total to 1,500 BTC
Irish authorities seize another 500 Bitcoin, bringing 2026 total to 1,500 BTC

Bitcoin

Irish authorities recovered 500 Bitcoin in criminal proceeds, bringing the total seized by the Crimi...

India's central bank revives push to isolate banks from crypto: Report
India's central bank revives push to isolate banks from crypto: Report

Crypto Market Analysis

The Indian central bank reportedly urged lawmakers to keep banks insulated from crypto and private s...

Defendant files to dismiss New York lawsuit seeking ownership of 39,069 Bitcoin wallets
Defendant files to dismiss New York lawsuit seeking ownership of 39,069 Bitcoin wallets

Bitcoin

A defendant who owns one of the dormant Bitcoin wallets filed to dismiss the New York case, which se...